![]() Jones and Keith Davis, Jones and Harris hypothesized that people would attribute apparently freely-chosen behaviors to disposition, and apparently chance-directed behaviors to situation. Jones wrote that he found Ross’s term “overly provocative and somewhat misleading”, and also joked, “Furthermore, I’m angry that I didn’t think of it first.” More recently some psychologists, including Daniel Gilbert, have begun using the term “correspondence bias” for the fundamental attribution error.Ĭlassic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967)īased on an earlier theory developed by Edward E. Ross argued in a popular paper that the fundamental attribution error forms the conceptual bedrock for the field of social psychology. The term was coined by Lee Ross some years after a now-classic experiment by Edward E. ![]() ![]() If Alice later tripped over the same rock herself, she would be more likely to blame the placement of the rock (situational). This discrepancy is called the actor–observer bias.Īs a simple example, if Alice saw Bob trip over a rock and fall, Alice might consider Bob to be clumsy or careless (dispositional). It does not explain interpretations of one’s own behavior-where situational factors are often taken into consideration. The fundamental attribution error is most visible when people explain the behavior of others. ![]() In social psychology, the fundamental attribution error (also known as correspondence bias or attribution effect) describes the tendency to over-value dispositional or personality-based explanations for the observed behaviors of others while under-valuing situational explanations for those behaviors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |